<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Theory of Bogus Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://silghtlysouthofsane.wordpress.com/2008/02/27/the-theory-of-bogus-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://silghtlysouthofsane.wordpress.com/2008/02/27/the-theory-of-bogus-science/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:55:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://silghtlysouthofsane.wordpress.com/2008/02/27/the-theory-of-bogus-science/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 04:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silghtlysouthofsane.wordpress.com/?p=105#comment-82</guid>
		<description>One of the biggest problems I have with those who say, &quot;but evolution is ONLY a THEORTY,&quot; is that they have no idea WHAT a theory is. Because people like to say my theory is this and my theory is that, they assume that a scientific theory is just a guess. These are people who need to take their heads out of their butts when they&#039;re talking about things they don&#039;t understand. 

Good post. I love a good rant against Creationists.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the biggest problems I have with those who say, &#8220;but evolution is ONLY a THEORTY,&#8221; is that they have no idea WHAT a theory is. Because people like to say my theory is this and my theory is that, they assume that a scientific theory is just a guess. These are people who need to take their heads out of their butts when they&#8217;re talking about things they don&#8217;t understand. </p>
<p>Good post. I love a good rant against Creationists.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://silghtlysouthofsane.wordpress.com/2008/02/27/the-theory-of-bogus-science/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silghtlysouthofsane.wordpress.com/?p=105#comment-81</guid>
		<description>http://theaginghipster.blogspot.com/2008/02/intelligent-design.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://theaginghipster.blogspot.com/2008/02/intelligent-design.html" rel="nofollow">http://theaginghipster.blogspot.com/2008/02/intelligent-design.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://silghtlysouthofsane.wordpress.com/2008/02/27/the-theory-of-bogus-science/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silghtlysouthofsane.wordpress.com/?p=105#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Plain and simple: Its agenda pushing, and there seems to be a lot more of it from the right wing than the left. Take my word for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plain and simple: Its agenda pushing, and there seems to be a lot more of it from the right wing than the left. Take my word for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
